nLab
petit topos

Contents

Idea

Recall that a Grothendieck topos T is a category of sheaves T=Sh(S) on some site S.

If S=Op(X) is the category of open subsets of a topological space X (or some manifold or the like) then one calls T a petit topos.

If S on the other hand is a category of all test spaces in some sense, such as

etc. one call T a gros topos .

Objects in a gros topos may be thought of as spaces modeled on S in the sense described at motivation for sheaves, cohomology and higher stacks and at space.

Also the objects in a petit topos Sh(Op(X)) – a category of sheaves on the category of open subsets of a topological space X – are a kind of generalized spaces, but generalized spaces over X on which the rigid structure of morphisms in Op(X) (only inclusions of subsets, no more general maps) induces a correspondingly rigid structure so that they are not all that general. In fact, Sh(Op(X)) is equivalent to etale spaces over X.

There is another notion of ‘large’ topos associated to a space X (or more generally an object in a site), namely the topos of sheaves on the slice category Top/X, with the obvious notion of covering family; a family is covering if it is so under the functor Top/XTop. This site is often referred to as the large site of X, as compared to the small site, which is Op(X) as above. The topos Sh(Top/X) can be viewed as spaces modelled Top (or more generally some site), but parameterised by the representable sheaf X.

Definition

The petit topos of an object a in a site (C,J) is the category of sheaves on the small site of a.

Examples

For X a topological space, the petit topos that it defines is the category of sheaves Sh(X):=Sh(Op(X)) on the category of open subsets of X. A general object in this topos is an etale space over X. The space X itself is incarnated as the terminal object X=*Sh(X).

A gros topos in which X is incarnated is a category of sheaves on a site of test spaces with which X may be probed. For instance for C= Top, or Diff or CartSp with their standard coverages, Sh(C) is such a gros topos.

In good cases the intrinsic properties of X do not depend on whether one regards it as an object of a petit or a gros topos. For instance at cohomology in the section Nonabelian sheaf cohomology with constant coefficients it is discussed how the nonabelian cohomology of a paracompact manifold X with constant coefficients gives the same answer in each case.

References

Some aspects of an axiomatic characterization of petit vs. gros toposes is in

  • Bill Lawvere, Axiomatic cohesion Theory and Applications of Categories, Vol. 19, No. 3, 2007, pp. 41–49. (pdf)

There is also something relevant in this article: