nLab
CartSp

CartSp

Idea

The category CartSp is the category of cartesian spaces n and smooth functions between them. This is the basic category of test spaces on which differential geometry and its generalizations is modeled.

Definition

By CartSp we denote the category

So CartSp may be thought of as the full subcategory of Diff on the smooth manifolds of the form n for n.

Some variants of this are of interest:

Geometry induced from CartSp.

Along the general lines of notions of space we have the following notions of spaces modeled on CartSp.

Consider CartSp as a site with the standard notion of coverage (for instance good open covers, using that fact that a Cartesian space is diffeomorphic to an open ball).

Then

  • the category of very general spaces modeled on CartSp is the sheaf topos Sh(CartSp);

    Some objects in here are indeed very general spaces. For instance there is the sheaf Ω p: nΩ closed p( n) that assigns sets of closed differential forms. This is a very non-classical object. For instance in that this space has just a single point, a single curve, a single surface, and so on, up to a single (p1)-dimensional plot, but then has infinitely many p-dimensional plots. Despite this non-classicality, this is a very natural and useful object. To some extent it plays the role of an Eilenberg-MacLane space K(,p), even though it is far from having an underlying topological space.

  • Accordingly, the first major subcategories inside Sh(Cart) of more tame objects are those sheaves that do have underlying topological spaces: these are the concrete sheaves

    DiffeologicalSpacesSh(CartSp)DiffeologicalSpaces \subset Sh(CartSp)

    called diffeological spaces. Among them objects like Frölicher spaces play roughly the role of locally CartSp-ringed spaces, vaguely in the sense of structured (∞,1)-toposes.

  • Refining one step further to even more tame objects inside Sh(CartSp) we arrive at those concrete sheaves that are locally isomorphic to a representable functor. i.e. to a Cartesian space itsef. These are the smooth manifolds

    SmoothManifoldsDiffeologicalSpacesSh(CartSp).SmoothManifolds \hookrightarrow DiffeologicalSpaces \hookrightarrow Sh(CartSp) \,.
  • Finally the Cartesian test spaces themselves sind inside this hierarchy via the Yoneda embedding CartSpSh(CartSp) , which we have hence factored as

    CartSpSmoothManifoldsDiffeologicalSpacesSh(CartSp).CartSp \hookrightarrow SmoothManifolds \hookrightarrow DiffeologicalSpaces \hookrightarrow Sh(CartSp) \,.

As already indicated, this story in ordinary category theory may be lifted to higher topos theory. The (∞,1)-topos Sh (,1)(CartSp) is a model for generalized Lie ∞-groupoids. The fact that a Cartesian space is effectively just a smooth open ball makes this a locally contractible (∞,1)-topos.

Dually, using that CartSp is evidently the syntactic category of a Lawvere theory (even of a Fermat theory) there are the generalized quantities modeled on CartSp, algebras over this theory:

Iterating this way of passing from simple test spaces to spaces and quantities modeled on them, we can next consider

  • C Alg op:=Func ×(CartSp,Set) op

and

  • (,1)C Alg op:=Func ×(CartSp,Grpd) op

as new categories of test spaces, and pass to generalized spaces modeled on these.

The very general spaces modeled on C Alg op form the smooth toposes used in the well-adapted Models for Smooth Infinitesimal Analysis in the context of synthetic differential geometry.

On the other hand, considering locally ringed spaces with local rings of functions in (,1)C Alg op leads to the notion of derived smooth manifolds.

References

There are various slight variations of the category CartSp that one can consider without changing its basic properties as a category of test spaces for generalized smooth spaces. A different choice that enjoys some popularity in the literature is the category of open (contractible) subsets of Euclidean spaces. For more references on this see diffeological space.

The site ThCartSp of infinitesimally thickened Cartesian spaces is known as the site for the Cahiers topos. It is considered

in detal in section 5 of

and briefly mentioned in example 2) on p. 191 of

following the original article

With an eye towards Frölicher spaces the site is also considered in section 5 of

  • Hirokazu Nishimura?, Beyond the Regnant Philosophy of Manifolds (arXiv:0912.0827)

category: category