For a morphism in a category with pullbacks, there is an induced functor
of over-categories. This is the base change morphism. If is a topos, then this refines to an essential geometric morphism
The dual concept is cobase change.
For a morphism in a category with pullbacks, there is an induced functor
of over-categories. It is on objects given by pullback/fiber product along
The concept of base change generalises from this case to other fibred categories.
For is a topos (or (∞,1)-topos, etc.) a morphism in , then base change induces an essential geometric morphism betwen over-toposes/over-(∞,1)-toposes
where is given by postcomposition with and by pullback along .
That we have adjoint functors/adjoint (∞,1)-functors follows directly from the universal property of the pullback. The fact that has a further right adjoint is due to the fact that it preserves all small colimits/(∞,1)-colimits by the fact that in a topos we have universal colimits and then by the adjoint functor theorem/adjoint (∞,1)-functor theorem.
is a logical functor. Hence is also an atomic geometric morphism.
This appears for instance as (MacLaneMoerdijk, theorem IV.7.2).
By prop. 1 is a right adjoint and hence preserves all limits, in particular finite limits.
Notice that the subobject classifier of an over topos is . This product is preserved by the pullback by which acts, hence preserves the subobject classifier.
To show that is logical it therefore remains to show that it also preserves exponential objects. (…)
A (necessarily essential and atomic) geometric morphism of the form is called the base change geometric morphism along .
The right adjoint is also called the dependent product relative to .
The left adjoint is also called the dependent sum relative to .
In the case is the terminal object, the base change geometric morphism is also called an etale geometric morphism. See there for more details
If is a locally cartesian closed category then for every morphism in the inverse image of the base change is a cartesian closed functor.
See at cartesian closed functor – Examples for a proof.
Base change geometric morphisms may be interpreted in terms of fiber integration. See integral transforms on sheaves for more on this.
base change
A general discussion that applies (also) to enriched categories and internal categories is in
Discussion in the context of topos theory is around example A.4.1.2 of
and around theorem IV.7.2 in
Discussion in the context of (infinity,1)-topos theory is in section 6.3.5 of
See also