nLab
overcategory

Contents

Definition

The slice category or over category C/c of a category C over an object cC has

  • objects that are all arrows fC such that cod(f)=c, and
  • morphisms g:XXC from f:Xc to f:Xc such that fg=f.
C/c={X g X f f c}C/c = \left\lbrace \array{ X &&\stackrel{g}{\to}&& X' \\ & {}_f \searrow && \swarrow_{f'} \\ && c } \right\rbrace

The slice category is a special case of a comma category.

There is a forgetful functor U c:C/cC which maps an object f:Xc to its domain X and a morphism g:XXC (from f:Xc to f:Xc such that fg=f) to the morphism g:XX.

The dual notion is an under category.

Examples

  • If C=P is a poset and pP, then the slice category P/p is the down set (p) of elements qP with qp.

  • If 1 is a terminal object in C, then C/1 is isomorphic to C.

Properties

Relation to codomain fibration

The assignment of overcategories C/c to objects cC extends to a functor

C/():CCat,C/(-) : C \to Cat \,,

Under the Grothendieck construction this functor corresponds the the codomain fibration

cod:[I,C]Ccod : [I,C] \to C

from the arrow category of C.

Presheaves on over-categories and over-categories of presheaves

Let C be a category, c an object of C and let C/c be the over category of C over c. Write PSh(C/c)=[(C/C) op,Set] for the category of presheaves on C/c and write PSh(C)/Y(y) for the over category of presheaves on C over the presheaf Y(c), where Y:CPSh(c) is the Yoneda embedding.

Proposition

There is an equivalence of categories

e:PSh(C/c)PSh(C)/Y(c).e : PSh(C/c) \stackrel{\simeq}{\to} PSh(C)/Y(c) \,.
Proof

The functor e takes FPSh(C/c) to the presheaf F:d fC(d,c)F(f) which is equipped with the natural transformation η:FY(c) with component map η d fC(d,c)F(f)C(d,c).

A weak inverse of e is given by the functor

e¯:PSh(C)/Y(c)PSh(C/c)\bar e : PSh(C)/Y(c) \to PSh(C/c)

which sends η:FY(C)) to FPSh(C/c) given by

F:(f:dc)F(d) c,F : (f : d \to c) \mapsto F'(d)|_c \,,

where F(d) c is the pullback

F(d) c F(d) η d pt f C(d,c).\array{ F'(d)|_c &\to& F'(d) \\ \downarrow && \downarrow^{\eta_d} \\ pt &\stackrel{f}{\to}& C(d,c) } \,.
Example

Suppose the presheaf FPSh(C/c) does not actually depend on the morphsims to C, i.e. suppose that it factors through the forgetful functor from the over category to C:

F:(C/c) opC opSet.F : (C/c)^{op} \to C^{op} \to Set \,.

Then F(d)= fC(d,c)F(f)= fC(d,c)F(d)C(d,c)×F(d) and hence F=Y(c)×F with respect to the closed monoidal structure on presheaves.

See also functors and comma categories.

For the analog statement in (∞,1)-category theory see

at (∞,1)-category of (∞,1)-presheaves.

In higher category theory

The notion of over category applicable to (∞,1)-categories is discussed at over quasi-category.

Similarly, there is a notion of model structure on an over category.