nLab
locally constant infinity-stack

Context

(,1)-Topos Theory

(∞,1)-topos theory

Background

Definitions

Characterization

Morphisms

Extra stuff, structure and property

Models

Constructions

structures in a cohesive (∞,1)-topos

Cohomology

cohomology

Special and general types

Special notions

Variants

Extra structure

Operations

Theorems

Contents

Idea

Recall that a locally constant sheaf (of sets) is a section of the constant stack with fiber the groupoid Core(FinSet), the core of the category FinSet.

This extends to a general pattern:

a locally constant -stack is a section of the constant ∞-stack that is constant on the ∞-groupoid Core(FinGrpd).

Definition

For H an (∞,1)-sheaf (∞,1)-topos there is the terminal (∞,1)-geometric morphism

(LConstΓ):HGrpd(LConst \dashv \Gamma) : \mathbf{H} \to \infty Grpd

consisting of the global section and the constant ∞-stack (∞,1)-functor.

Write 𝒮:=core(FinGrpd)Grpd for the core ∞-groupoid of the (∞,1)-category of finite -groupoids. (We can drop the finiteness condition by making use of a larger universe.) This is canonically a pointed object *𝒮.

Notice the for XH any object, the over-(∞,1)-topos H/X is the little (,1)-topos of X. Objects in here we may regard as -stacks on X.

Definition

For XH an object a locally constant -stack on X is an morphism XLConst𝒮.

The ∞-groupoid of locally constant -stacks on X is

LConst(X):=H(X,LConst𝒮).LConst(X) := \mathbf{H}(X, LConst \mathcal{S}) \,.
Remark

An an object of the little (∞,1)-topos of X, the over-(∞,1)-topos H/X the locally constant -stack given by ˜ is its (∞,1)-Grothendieck construction in H

P * X ˜ LConst𝒮\array{ P &\to& * \\ \downarrow &\swArrow& \downarrow \\ X &\stackrel{\tilde \nabla}{\to}& LConst \mathcal{S} }

the pullback of the universal fibration of finite ∞-groupoids

P LConst𝒵 X ˜ LConst𝒮.\array{ P &\to& LConst \mathcal{Z} \\ \downarrow && \downarrow \\ X &\stackrel{\tilde \nabla}{\to}& LConst \mathcal{S} } \,.
Remark

A locally constant -stack is also called a local system. See there for more details.

Examples

Here are commented references that establish aspects of the above general abstract situation.

Locally constant 1-stacks and 2-stacks on topological spaces

A discussion of locally constant 2-stacks over topological spaces is in

We indicate briefly how the results stated in this article fit into the general abstract picture as indicated above:

The authors consider locally constant 1-stacks and 2-stacks on sites of open subsets of topological spaces.

Prop. 1.1.9 gives the adjunction

(LConstΓ):Sh (2,1)(X)ΓLConstGrpd(LConst \dashv \Gamma) : Sh_{(2,1)}(X) \stackrel{\overset{LConst}{\leftarrow}}{\underset{\Gamma}{\to}} Grpd

between forming constant stacks and taking global sections.

Then prop 1.2.5, 1.2.6, culminating in theorem 1.2.9, p. 121 gives (somewhat implicitly) the other adjunction

(Π 1LConst):Op(X)Sh (2,1)(X)Π 1LConstGrpd(\Pi_1\dashv LConst) : Op(X) \hookrightarrow Sh_{(2,1)}(X) \stackrel{\overset{LConst}{\leftarrow}}{\underset{\Pi_1}{\to}} Grpd

with the right adjoint to LConst being the fundamental groupoid functor on representables. (Where we change a bit the perspective on the results as presented there, to amplify the pattern indicated above. For instance where the authors write Γ(X,C X) we think of this here equivalently as Sh (2,1)(X)(X,LConst(C)), so that the theorem then gives the adjunction equivalence Grpd(Π 1(X),C)).

Then in essentially verbatim analogy, these results are lifted from stacks to 2-stacks in section 2, where now prop 2.2.2, 2.2.3, culminating in theorem 2.2.5, p. 132 gives (somewhat implicitly) the adjunction

(Π 2LConst):Op(X)Sh (3,1)(X)Π 2LConstGrpd(\Pi_2\dashv LConst) : Op(X) \hookrightarrow Sh_{(3,1)}(X) \stackrel{\overset{LConst}{\leftarrow}}{\underset{\Pi_2}{\to}} Grpd

now with the path 2-groupoid operation (locally) left adjoint to forming constant 2-stacks. (Subjct verbatim to a remark as above.)

Locally constant -stacks on topological spaces

A discussion of locally constant -stacks over topological spaces is in

In theorem 2.13, p. 25 the author proves an equivalence of (∞,1)-categories (modeled there as Segal categories)

LConst(X)Fib(Π(X))LConst(X) \simeq Fib(\Pi(X))

of locally constant ∞-stacks on X and Kan fibrations over the fundamental ∞-groupoid Π(X)=Sing(X).

But by the right Quillen functor Id:sSet QuillensSet Joyal from the Quillen model structure on simplicial sets to the Joyal model structure on simplicial sets every Kan fibration is a categorical fibration and every categorical fibration over a Kan complex is a Cartesian fibration (as discussed there) and a coCartesian fibration. Finally, by the (∞,1)-Grothendieck construction, these are equivalent to (∞,1)-functors Π(X)Grpd.

In total this means that via the Grothendieck construction Toën’s result does actually produce an equivalence

LConst(X)Func(Π(X),Grpd).LConst(X) \simeq Func(\Pi(X), \infty Grpd) \,.

Pattern

A locally constant sheaf / -stack is also called a local system.

References

Section A.1 of

See also the references at geometric homotopy groups in an (∞,1)-topos.

Revised on March 4, 2012 18:01:40 by Urs Schreiber (89.204.154.86)