Let be a topological space which is well-connected in that it is
Then there is a connected and simply connected covering space with the universal property that for any other covering space there is a map of covering spaces .
There is a functorial construction of a covering space of a pointed space
where is the full subcategory of with objects the well-connected spaces and is the subcategory of of pointed maps of spaces with objects the covering space maps.
David Roberts: We should move the construction of the universal covering space from covering space to here, but I have limited time.
Urs Schreiber: some of it is now below. Some not.
We describe now how the universal cover construction may be understood from the nPOV. In the next section this point of view is then used to conceive notions of covering spaces and higher covering spaces in more general contexts of (∞,1)-toposes.
To a topological space is associated the topological groupoid – its fundamental groupoid. With regarded as a categorically discrete topological groupoid, there is a canonical morphism
that includes as the collection of constants paths.
Let be a suitably well behaved pointed space. The universal cover of is (equivalent to) the homotopy fiber of in the (∞,1)-category of topological ∞-groupoids.
In other words, the principal ∞-bundle classified by the cocycle is the universal cover : we have a homotopy pullback square
Urs Schreiber: may need polishing.
We place ourselves in the context of topological ∞-groupoids and regard both the space as well as its homotopy ∞-groupoid and its truncation to the fundamental groupoid as objects in there.
The canonical morphism hence given by the inclusion of constant paths may be regarded as a cocycle for a -principal ∞-bundle, respectively for a -principal bundle.
Let be the set of connected components of , regarded as a topological -groupoid, and choose any section of the projection .
Then the -principal -bundle classified by the cocycle is its homotopy fiber, i.e. the homotopy pullback
We think of this topological -groupoid as the universal covering -groupoid of . To break this down, we check that its decategorification gives the ordinary universal covering space:
for this we compute the homotopy pullback
where we assume to be connected with chosen baspoint just to shorten the exposition a little. By the laws of homotopy pullbacks in general and homotopy fibers in particular, we may compute this as the ordinary pullback of a weakly equivalent diagram, where the point is resolved to the universal -principal bundle
(More in detail, what we do behind the scenes is this: we regard the diagram as a diagram in the global model structure on simplicial presheaves on Top. In there all our topological groupoids are fibrant, hence all we have to ensure is that one of the morphisms of the diagram becomes a fibration, which is what the passage to achieves. Then the ordinary pullback in the category of simplicial presheaves is the homotopy pullback in -prestacks. Then by left exactness of -stackification, the image of that in -stacks is still a homotopy pullback. )
The topological groupoid has as objects homotopy classes rel endpoints of paths in starting at and as morphisms it has commuting triangles
in . The topology on this can be deduced from thinking of this as the pullback
in simplicial presheaves on Top. Unwinding what this means we find that the open sets in are those where the endpoint evaluation produces an open set in .
Now it is immediate to read off the homotopy pullback as the ordinary pullback
Since is categorically discrete, this simply produces the space of objects of over the points of , which is just the space of all paths in starting at with the projection being endpoint evaluation.
This indeed is then the usual construction of the universal covering space in terms of paths, as described for instance in
Urs Schreiber: here is something that I am thinking about.
Let be a locally contractible (∞,1)-topos . Write
for the internal homotopy ∞-groupoid functor.
For write
for the reflective (∞,1)-subcategory of n-truncated objects and for the localization
Urs Schreiber: various s here will be off by . Too tired to straighten this out right now.
Write
for the internal homotopy -groupoid. For we have the (∞,1)-Postnikov tower
For , the universal geometric -connected cover of is the homotopy fiber of .
We have that .
A homotopy-commuting diagram
in corresponds by the adjunction relation to diagram
in ∞Grpd. This being universal means that is -connected, and universal with that property as an object over .
By running this construction through the Postnikov tower for , we obtain the Whitehead tower in an (∞,1)-topos
of .
An account of the traditional way to think of the construction of the universal covering space is