Comment by Tim van Beek: There is possible overlap with projection measure, and I’m not sure how to reconcile this.
Spectral measures are an essential tool of functional analysis on Hilbert spaces. Spectral measures are projection-valued measures and are used to state various forms of spectral theorems.
In the following, let be a Hilbert space and be the algebra of bounded linear operators on and the orthogonal projections.
The following paragraphs will explain the concept of a spectral measure in the real case, this is sufficient if one is interested in spectral theorems of selfadjoint operators only, and can also serve as a simple introduction to the general ideas.
Do not confuse this concept with the “resolution of identity” in (real) differential geometry.
definition: A resolution of the identity is a map satisfying the following conditions:
(monotony): For with we have .
(continuity from above): for all we have .
(boundary condition): and .
If there is a finite such that for all and for all , than the resolution is called bounded, otherwise unbounded.
Let E be a spectral resolution and be a bounded Intervall in . We define the spectral measure of with respect to as
This allows us to define the integral of a step function with respect to E as
The value of this integral is a bounded operator.
As in conventional measure and integration theory, the integral can be extended from step functions to Borel-measurable functions. In this case one often used notation is
For general function need not be a bounded operator of course, the domain of is (theorem):
The SNAG theorem is necessary to explain the spectrum condition of the Haag-Kastler axioms.
Let be a locally compact, abelian topological group, the character group of , a Hilbert space and an unitary representation of in the algebra of bounded operators of . The following theorem is sometimes called (classical) SNAG theorem (SNAG = Stone-Naimark-Ambrose-Godement):
The equality holds in the weak sense, i.e. the integral converges in the weak operator topology. The spectrum of , denoted by , is defined to be the support of this spectral measure .
The groups of translations on is both isomorph to and to it’s own character group, every character is of the form for a fixed . So in this case theorem 1 becomes:
This allows us to talk about the support of the spectral measure, i.e. the spectrum of , as a subset of .
The theorem 1 is theorem 4.44 in the following classic book: