nLab
shape modality

Context

Cohesive -Toposes

cohesive topos

cohesive (∞,1)-topos

cohesive homotopy type theory

Backround

Definition

Presentation over a site

Structures in a cohesive (,1)-topos

structures in a cohesive (∞,1)-topos

Structures with infinitesimal cohesion

infinitesimal cohesion

Models

Modalities, Closure and Reflection

Contents

Idea

Given an (∞,1)-topos H (or just a 1-topos) equipped with an idempotent monad Π:HH (a (higher) modality/closure operator) which preserves (∞,1)-pullbacks over objects in its essential image, one may call a morphism f:XY in H Π-closed if the unit-diagram

X η X Π(X) f Π(f) Y η Y Π(Y)\array{ X &\stackrel{\eta_X}{\to}& \mathbf{\Pi}(X) \\ \downarrow^{\mathrlap{f}} && \downarrow^{\mathrlap{\mathbf{\Pi}(f)}} \\ Y &\stackrel{\eta_Y}{\to}& \mathbf{\Pi}(Y) }

is an (∞,1)-pullback diagram. These Π-closed morphisms form the right half of an orthogonal factorization system, the left half being the morphisms that are sent to equivalences in H.

Definition

Definition

Let (ΠDiscΓ):HGrpd be an infinity-connected (infinity,1)-topos, let Π:=DiscΠ be the geometric path functor / geometric homotopy functor, let f:XY be a H-morphism, let c Πf denote the ∞-pullback

c Πf ΠX Π f Y 1 (ΠDisc) ΠY\array{c_{\mathbf{\Pi}} f&\to& {\mathbf{\Pi}} X\\\downarrow&&\downarrow^{{\mathbf{\Pi}}_f}\\Y&\xrightarrow{1_{(\Pi\dashv \Disc)}}&{\mathbf{\Pi}}Y}

c Πf is called Π-closure of f.

f is called Π-closed if Xc Πf.

If a morphism f:XY factors into f=gh and h is a Π-equivalence then g is Π-closed; this is seen by using that Π is idempotent.

Properties

General

Π-closed morphisms are a right class of an orthogonal factorization system (in an (∞,1)-category) and hence, as discussed there, are closed under limits, composition, retracts and satisfy the left cancellation property.

As open maps

A consequence of the previous property is that the class of Π-closed morphisms gives rise to an admissible structure in the sense of structured spaces on an (∞,1)-connected (∞,1)-topos, hence they serve as a class of a kind of open maps.

Examples

Internal locally constant -stacks

In a cohesive (∞,1)-topos H with an ∞-cohesive site of definition, the fundamental ∞-groupoid-functor Π satisfies the above assumptions (this is the example gives this entry its name). The Π-closed morphisms into some XH are canonically identified with the locally constant ∞-stacks over X. The correspondence is effectively what is called categorical Galois theory.

Proposition

Let H be a cohesive (∞,1)-topos possessing a ∞-cohesive site of definition. Then for XH the locally constant ∞-stacks ELConst(X), regarded as ∞-bundle morphisms p:EX are precisely the Π-closed morphisms into X

Formally étale morphisms

If a differential cohesive (∞,1)-topos H th, the de Rham space functor Π inf satisfies the above assumptions. The Π inf-closed morphisms are precisely the formally étale morphisms.

cohesion

differential cohesion

References

The examples of locally constant -stacks and of formally étale morphisms are discussed in sections 3.5.6 and 3.7.3 of

Revised on January 5, 2013 21:44:54 by Urs Schreiber (89.204.138.93)