Classically, a logarithm is a partially-defined smooth homomorphism from a multiplicative group of number?s to an additive group of numbers. As such, it is a partial section? of an exponential map. As exponential maps can be generalised to Lie groups, so can logarithms.
Consider the field of real numbers; these numbers form a Lie group under addition (which we will call simply ), while the nonzero numbers form a Lie group under multiplication (which we will call ). The multiplicative group has two connected components; we will focus attention on the identity component (which we will call ), consisting of the positive numbers.
The Lie groups and are in fact isomorphic. In fact, there is one isomorphism for each positive real number other than ; this number is called the base. Fixing a base, the map from to is called the real logarithm with base , written ; the map from to is the real exponential map with base , written .
The real logarithms are handily defined using the Riemann integral as follows:
Note that is itself a logarithm, the natural logarithm, whose base is . (The exponential map may similarly be defined as an infinite series, but I'll leave that for its own article.)
Now consider the field of complex numbers; these also form a Lie group under addition (which we call ), while the nonzero numbers form a Lie group under multiplication (which we call ). Now the multiplicative group is connected, so we would like to use all of it.
However, and are not isomorphic. In fact, not only is there no isomorphism from to ; the only such homomorphism is the zero morphism . (Essentially, this is because is simply connected while is not.) On the other hand, we still have plenty of homomorphisms from to , one for each nonzero complex number , and these homomorphisms are surjections whenever .
So we have these surjections (the complex exponential map with base , for ), which are regular epimorphisms but not split epimorphisms. However, while they have no sections (being not split), they have quite a few partial section?s, and the domains of the maximal? partial sections are precisely the connected simply connected dense subspaces of . A complex logarithm with base on is this -defined section of the complex exponential map with base .
If , then a complex natural logarithm on may be defined using the contour integral with the same formula (1) as for the real natural logarithm. We merely insist that the integral be done along a contour within the region . (Since is connected, there is such a contour; since is simply connected and is holomorphic, the result is unique.) Note that if , then the real and complex natural logarithms of will be equal.
The natural exponential map is periodic? (with period ), and it is possible to add any multiple of this period to the natural logarithm of any by suitably changing the region . We then obtain the most general notion of maximally-defined complex logarithm with any base by using the formulas
where for and we use any previously defined natural complex logarithm.
In the classical examples, the multiplicative groups and are both Lie groups. The additive groups and are also Lie groups, but they are more than this: they are Lie algebras. (The additive group of a Lie algebra is always a Lie group. Actually, since these are abelian Lie algebras, their Lie-algebra structure is easy to miss, but of course they are vector spaces.) And what's more, each additive group is the Lie algebra of the corresponding Lie group.
This generalises. Given any Lie group , let be its Lie algebra. Then we have an exponential map , which is surjective under certain conditions (most famously when is connected and compact, but also in the classical cases, even though is not compact). More generally, given any automorphism of , we have a map , which is a homomorphism of Lie groups. Any partial section? of this map may be called a logarithm base on ; any partial section of itself may be called a natural logarithm on .