equivalences in/of -categories
An ordinary category is idempotent complete, aka Karoubi complete or Cauchy complete , if every idempotent splits. Since the splitting of an idempotent is a limit or colimit of that idempotent, any category with all finite limits or all finite colimits is idempotent complete.
In an (∞,1)-category the idea is the same, except that the notion of idempotent is more complicated. Instead of just requiring that , we need an equivalence , together with higher coherence data saying that, for instance, the two derived equivalences are equivalent, and so on up. In particular, being idempotent is no longer a property of a morphism, but structure on it.
It is still true that a splitting of an idempotent in an -category is a limit or colimit of that idempotent (now regarded as a diagram with all its higher coherence data), but this limit is no longer a finite limit; thus an -category can have all finite limits without being idempotent-complete.
Let for a linearly ordered set the simplicial set be defined to be the nerve of ; i.e. is given in degree given by nondecreasing maps .
The simplicial set is defined as follows: for every nonempty, finite, linearly ordered set J, is the set of pairs , where and is an equivalence relation on which satisfies the following condition:
Let denote the simplicial subset of , corresponding to those pairs such that . Let denote the simplicial subset corresponding to those pairs such that the quotient has at most one element.
Let C be an -category, incarnated as a quasi-category.
An idempotent morphism in C is a map of simplicial sets . We will refer to as the -category of idempotents in .
A weak retraction diagram in is a homomorphism of simplicial sets . We refer to as the -category of weak retraction diagrams in .
A strong retraction diagram in is a map of simplicial sets . We will refer to as the -category of strong retraction diagrams in .
An idempotent is effective if it extends to a map .
(Lurie, above corollary 4.4.5.14)
An idempotent diagram is effective precisely if it admits an (∞,1)-limit, equivalently if it admits an (∞,1)-colimit.
By (Lurie, lemma 4.3.2.13).
is called an idempotent complete if every idempotent is effective.
(Lurie, above corollary 4.4.5.14)
The following properties generalize those of idempotent-complete 1-categories.
A small (∞,1)-category is idempotent-complete if and only if it is accessible.
This is HTT, 5.4.3.6.
For a small (∞,1)-category and a regular cardinal, the (∞,1)-Yoneda embedding with the full subcategory on -compact objects exhibits as the idempotent completion of .
This is HTT, lemma 5.4.2.4.
Section 4.4.5 of