nLab
Hopf module

Idea

The Hopf modules over bimonoids are modules in the category of comodules or viceversa. This notion has many generalizations and variants. Relative Hopf modules are an algebraic and possibly noncommutative analogue of a notion of an equivariant sheaf.

Definition

Given a k-bialgebra (H,m H,η,Δ,ϵ), a left-right Hopf module of H is a k-module M with the structure of left H-module and right H-comodule, where the action ν:HMM and right H-coaction ρ:MMH are compatible in the sense that the coaction is a morphism of left modules. In this, the structure of left module on MH is the standard tensor product of modules over Hopf algebras, with the action given by (νm H)(HτH)(ΔMH) as k-linear map H(MH)MH where τ=τ H,M:HMMH is the standard flip of tensor factors in the symmetric monoidal category of k-modules.

An immediate generalization of Hopf modules is for the case where (E,eho E) is a right H-comodule algebra (a monoid in the category of H-comodules); then one can define the category E H of left E- right H- relative Hopf modules (less precisely, (E,H)-relative Hopf modules, or simply (relative) Hopf modules), which are left E-modules that are right H-comodules with a natural compatibility condition. In Sweedler notation for comodules. where ρ(m)=m (0)m (1), ρ E(e)=e (0)e (1), the compatibility condition for the left-right relative Hopf modules is ρ(em)=e (0)m (0)e (1)m (1) for all mM and eE.

There are further generalizations where instead of a bialgebra H and a H-comodule algebra E one replaces E by an arbitrary algebra A, and H by a coalgebra C and introduces a compatibility in the sense of a mixed distributive law or entwining (structure). Then the relative Hopf modules become a special case of so-called entwined modules, see the monograph [BW 2003].

Geometrically, relative Hopf modules are instances of equivariant objects (equivariant quasicoherent sheaves) in noncommutative algebraic geometry, the statement of which can be made precise, cf. [Škoda 2008].

Furthermore, in the context of relative Hopf modules there is an analogue of the faithfully flat descent along torsors from commutative algebraic geometry, and the Galois descent theorems in algebra. Its main instance is Schneider's theorem, asserting that if H is a Hopf algebra and UE a faithfully flat H-Hopf-Galois extension then the natural adjunction between the categories of relative (E,H)-Hopf modules and left U-modules is an equivalence of categories. This corresponds to the classical theorem saying that the category of equivariant quasicoherent sheaves over the total space of a torsor is equivalent to the category of the quasicoherent sheaves over the base of the torsor.

One can also consider Hopf bimodules, and similar categories. The category H H H H is related to the category of Yetter-Drinfeld modules.

Fundamental theorem on Hopf modules

If H is a Hopf algebra over a field k, then the category of the ordinary Hopf modules H H is equivalent to the category of k-vector spaces. See e.g. Montgomery’s book.

References

Related entries include comodule algebra, Schneider's descent theorem, Yetter-Drinfeld module, entwined module

  • BW2003: T. Brzeziński, R. Wisbauer, Corings and comodules, London Math. Soc. Lec. Note Series 309, Cambridge 2003.
  • Škoda 2008: Z. Škoda, Some equivariant constructions in noncommutative algebraic geometry, Georgian Mathematical Journal 16 (2009), No. 1, 183–202, arXiv:0811.4770 MR2011b:14004
  • Susan Montgomery, Hopf algebras and their actions on rings, CBMS Lecture Notes 82, AMS 1993, 240p.
  • Peter Schauenburg, Hopf Modules and Yetter - Drinfel′d Modules, Journal of Algebra 169:3 (1994) 874-890 doi; Hopf modules and the double of a quasi-Hopf algebra, Trans. Amer. Math. Soc. 354 (2002), 3349-3378 doi pdf; Actions of monoidal categories, and generalized Hopf smash products, Journal of Algebra 270 (2003) 521-563, doi ps
  • A. Borowiec, G. A. Vazquez Coutino, Hopf modules and their duals, math.QA/0007151
  • H-J. Schneider, Principal homogeneous spaces for arbitrary Hopf algebras, Israel J. Math. 72 (1990), no. 1-2, 167–195 MR92a:16047 doi

Revised on November 29, 2012 22:35:41 by Zoran Škoda (193.51.104.65)