nLab
A Survey of Elliptic Cohomology - A-equivariant cohomology

cohomology

Special and general types

Special notions

Variants

Extra structure

Operations

Theorems

Edit this sidebar


higher algebra

universal algebra

Algebraic theories

Algebras and modules

Higher algebras

Model category presentations

Geometry on formal duals of algebras

Theorems

Edit this sidebar

This is a sub-entry of

see there for background and context.

This entry contains a basic introduction to getting equivariant cohomology from derived group schemes.

Previous:

Next:

the following are rough unpolished notes taken more or less verbatim from some seminar talk – needs attention, meaning: somebody should go through this and polish


Contents

Derived Elliptic Curves

Definition A derived elliptic curve over an (affine) derived scheme SpecA is a commutative derived group scheme (CDGS) E/A such that E¯Specπ 0A is an elliptic curve.

Let A be an E -ring. Let E(A) denote the -groupoid of oriented elliptic curves over SpecA. Note that E(A) is in particular a space (we will return to this point later).

The point is to prove the following due to Lurie.

Theorem The functor AE(A) is representable by a derived Deligne-Mumford stack Der=(,O ). Further, is equivalent to the topos underlying 1,1 and π 0O =O 1,1. Also, restricting to discrete rings, O provides a lift in sense of Hopkins and Miller.

G-Equivariant A-cohomology

The Strategy

  1. Define A S 1(*);

  2. Extend to A S 1(X) where X is a trivial S 1-space;

  3. Define A T(X) where T is a compact abelian Lie group where X is again a trivial T-space;

  4. Extend to A T(X) for any (finite enough) T-space;

  5. Define A G(X) for G any compact Lie group.

S 1-equivariance

To accomplish (1) we need a map

σ:SpfA P G\sigma : \mathrm{Spf} A^{\mathbb{C} P^\infty} \to \mathbf{G}

over SpecA. Then we can define A S 1(*)=O(G). Such a map arises from a completion map

A S 1A P A_{S^1} \to A^{\mathbb{C}P^\infty}

which we may interpret as a preorientation σMap(BS 1,G(A)). Recall that such a map σ is an orientation if the induced map to the formal completion of G is an isomorphism.

Recall two facts:

  1. There is a bijection {BS 1G(A)}{SpfA BS 1G};

  2. Orientations of the multiplicative group G m associated to A are in bijection with maps of E -rings {KA}, where K is the K-theory spectrum.

Theorem We can define equivariant A-cohomology using G m if and only if A is a K-algebra.

The Abelian Lie Group Case for a Point

Fix G/A oriented. Now let T be a compact abelian Lie group. We construct a commutative derived group scheme M T over A whose global sections give A T which is equipped with an appropriate completion map.

Definition Define the Pontryagin dual, T^ of T by T^:=Hom Lie(T,S 1).

Examples

  1. T=T n, the n-fold torus. Then T^= n as

    T^(θ 1,,θ n)(k 1θ 1,,k nθ n).\hat T \ni ( \theta_1 , \dots , \theta_n ) \mapsto (k_1 \theta_1 , \dots , k_n \theta_n ).
  2. If T={e}, then T^=T.

Pontryagin Duality If T is an abelian, locally compact topological group then T^^T.

Definition Let B be an A-algebra. Define M T by

M T(B):=Hom AbTop(T^,G(B)).M_T (B) := \mathrm{Hom}_\mathrm{AbTop} (\hat T , \mathbf{G} (B)).

Further, M T is representable.

Examples

  1. M S 1(B)=Hom(,G(B))=G(B).

  2. M T n=G× SpecA× SpecAG.

  3. M /n=hker(×n:GG).

  4. M {e}(B)=Hom({e},G(B)={e}, so M {e} is final over SpecA, hence it is isomorphic to SpecA.

How do we get a completion map σ T:BTM T(A) for all T given an orientation σ S 1:BS 1G(A)? By a composition: define

Bev:BTHom(T^,BS 1),p(fBf(p))Bev: BT \to \mathrm{Hom}(\hat T , BS^1), \; p \mapsto (f \mapsto Bf(p))

then define

σ T:=σ S 1Bev.\sigma_T := \sigma_{S^1} \circ Bev.

Proposition There exists a map M^ such that the assignment TM T factors as TM^(BT). That is the functor M factors through the category of classifying spaces of compact Abelian Lie groups B(CALG) (considered as orbifolds). Further, such factorizations are in bijection with the preorientations of G.

Proof. That such a factorization exists defines M^ on objects. Now by choosing a base point in BT we have

Hom(BT,BT)BT×Hom(T,T)\mathrm{Hom} (BT , BT' ) \simeq BT' \times \mathrm{Hom} (T, T')

as spaces. Now we need a map

BTHom(M T,M T).BT' \to \mathrm{Hom} (M_T , M_{T'}) .

Because this map must be functorial in T and T we can restrict to the universal case where T is trivial and then

BTHom(M {e},M T)=M T(A)BT' \to \mathrm{Hom} ( M_{\{e\}} , M_{T'} ) = M_{T'} (A)

is just a preorientation σ T.

The Abelian Case for General Spaces

We will see that A T(X) is the global sections of a quasi-coherent sheaf on M T.

Theorem Let G be preoriented and X a finite T-CW complex. There exist a unique family of functors {F T} from finite T-spaces to the category of quasi-coherent sheaves on M T such that

  1. F T maps T-equivariant (weak) homotopy equivalences to equivalence of quasi-coherent sheaves;

  2. F T maps finite homotopy colimits to finite homotopy limits of quasi-coherent sheaves;

  3. F T(*)=O(M G);

  4. If TT and X=(X×T)/T then F T(X)f *(F T(X)), where f:M TM T is the induced map;

  5. The F T are compatible under finite chains of inclusions of subgroups TTT.

Proof. Use (2) to reduce to the case where X is a T-equivariant cell, i.e. X=T/T 0×D k for some subgroup T 0T. Use (1) to reduce to the case where X=T/T 0. Use (3) to conclude that F T(T/T 0)=f *F T 0(*). Finally, (4) implies that F T 0(*)=M^(*/T 0), where M^ is specified by the preorientation.

For trivial actions there is no dependence on the preorientation.

Remark

  1. F T(X) is actually a sheaf of algebras.

  2. If X,Y are T-spaces then we have maps

    F T(X)F T(X×Y)F T(Y)F_T (X) \to F_T (X \times Y) \leftarrow F_T (Y)

    and

    F T(X)F T(Y)F T(X×Y).F_T (X) \otimes F_T (Y) \to F_T (X \times Y).
  3. Define relative version for X 0X by

    F T(X,X 0)=hker(F T(X)F T(X 0))F_T (X, X_0 ) = hker (F_T (X) \to F_T (X_0 ))

    and for all T-spaces Y we have a map

    F T(X,X 0) AF T(Y)F T(X×Y,X 0×Y).F_T (X, X_0 ) \otimes_{A} F_T (Y) \to F_T (X \times Y , X_0 \times Y).

Definition A T(X)=Γ(F T(X)) as an E -ring (algebra).

We now verify loop maps on A T.

Recall that in the classical setting A n(X) is represented by a space Z n and we have suspension maps Z 0(S nZ n). Now we need to consider all possible T-equivariant deloopings, that is T-maps from S nZ n.

Theorem Let G be oriented, V a finite dimensional unitary representation of T. Denote by SVBV the unit sphere inside of the unit ball. Define L V=F T(BV,SV). Then

  1. L V is a line bundle on M T, i.e. invertible;

  2. For all (finite) T-spaces X the map

L VF T(X)F T(X×BV,X×SV)L_V \otimes F_T (X) \to F_T (X \times BV, X \times SV)

is an isomorphism.

Proof for T=S 1=U(1) and V=. Then

L V=hker(F T(BV)F T(SV)).L_V = hker ( F_T (BV) \to F_T (SV)) .

As BV is contractible F T(BV)=O(G) and by property (3) above F T(SV)=f *(O(SpecA)) for f:SpecAG is the identity section. As G is oriented, π 0G/π 0SpecA is smooth of relative dimension 1, so L V can be though of as the invertible sheaf of ideals defining the identity section of G.

Suppose V and V are representations of T then L VL VL VV is an equivalence. So if W is a virtual representation (i.e. W=UU) then L W=L U(L U) 1.

Definition Let V be a virtual representation of T and define

A T V(X)=π 0Γ(F T(X)L V 1).A_T^V (X) = \pi_0 \Gamma (F_T (X) \otimes L_V^{-1}) .

The point is that in order to define equivariant cohomology requires functors A G W for all representations of G, not just the trivial ones. In the derived setting we obtain this once we have an orientation of G.

The Non-Abelian Lie Group Case

Let A be an E -ring, G an orientated commutative derived group scheme over SpecA, and T a (not necessarily Abelian) compact Lie group.

Theorem There exists a functor A T from (finite?) T-spaces to Spectra which is uniquely characterized by the following.

  1. A T preserves equivalence;

  2. For T 0T, A T 0(X)=A T((X×G)/T 0);

  3. A T maps homotopy colimits to homotopy limits;

  4. If T is Abelian, then A T is defined as above;

  5. For all spaces X the map

A T(X)A T(X×E abT)A_T (X) \to A_T (X \times E^{ab} T)

where E abT is a T-space characterized by the requirement that for all Abelian subgroups T 0T, (E abT) T 0 is contractible and empty for T 0 not Abelian. Further, for Borel equivariant cohomology we require

  1. If T={e}, then A T(X)=A(X)=A X;

  2. A T(X)A T(X×ET) is an isomorphism.

Proof. In the case of ordinary equivariant cohomology we can use property (5) to reduce to the case where X has only Abelian stabilizer groups. Then via (3) we reduce to X being a colimit of T-equivariant cells D k×T/T 0 for T 0 Abelian. Via homotopy equivalence (1) we reduce to X=T/T 0. Using property (2) we see A T(X)=A T 0(*), so (4) yields A T 0(*)=M^(*/T 0)

Revised on July 7, 2010 19:57:56 by Anonymous Coward (75.64.209.193)